This article explains the physics of 5G microwaves, discusses what we know about the side effects of this type of electromagnetic radiation, and explains how we can protect ourselves.
Why did UK Column publish this article by Jobst Landgrebe? It is, in my informed opinion, extremely biased, suffers from obvious conflicts of interest, blatantly "cherry picks" and omits the scientific studies that show harm - such as CANCER and infertility.
Jobst Landgrebe's complete and total omission from this UK Column article of ANY mention of CANCER is very telling.
For those of us independent researchers in field, this is an instant red flag and we have seen this technique of omitting any research on CANCER or mention of CANCER being used time and time again usually by those who are in some way connected or dependent on the wireless industry, the INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONIZING-RADIATION PROTECTION 'ICNIRP', government, military, etc. See below.
The UK's Dr Sarah J. Starkey masterfully deconstructs these "cherry picking" techniques in ‘Inaccurate official assessment of radiofrequency safety by the Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation’ (2016) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27902455/ .
Please note that about thee (3) months after Dr Starkey's peer reviewed paper was published the UK Government shut down AGNIR. Why?
Cognotekt is directly linked according to its website to Biotech & Big Pharma companies - inc. BAYER that bought MONSANTO and now has Billions in liability re US court cases for Roundup/Glyphosate causing CANCER- amongst others, AI & IT = Big Tech companies such as MedGate https://medgate.de/ which use and are dependent on the wireless industry, medical technology, patient care that looks to automate, bring in AI and digitise patient care.
Why is Germany important?
In this UK Column article by Jobst Landgrebe he cites the INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONIZING-RADIATION PROTECTION 'ICNIRP' (5) times and only on the fifth (5th) time in the conclusion mentions that ICNIRP is "interest-driven" and "an association of telecommunications equipment manufacturers whose thresholds cannot be considered neutral" but once again Jobst Landgrebe is "cherry picking" and has left out some material facts why?
ICNIRPS links to the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMLPEX:
ICNIRP is a GERMAN based private organisation, an industry loyal Non Government Organisation (NGO). “ICNIRP selects its own members and its source of funding is not declared. New expert members of ICNIRP can only be elected by members of ICNIRP…
“Many of ICNIRP members have ties to the industry that is dependent on the ICNIRP guidelines. The [ICNIRP] guidelines are of huge economic and strategic importance to the military, telecoms/IT and power industry. Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines “do not cover cancer and other long-term or non-thermal health effects.”
“Thus, using the significantly higher [voluntary] guideline by ICNIRP gives a ‘green card’ to roll out the wireless digital technology thereby not considering non-thermal health effects from RF radiation. Numerous health hazards are disregarded such as CANCER, effects on neurotransmitters and neuroprotection, blood-brain-barrier, cognition, psychological addiction, sleep, behavioural problems and sperm quality.”
Below is taken from ICNIRP's website - I'll let you the reader decide if this is an organisation going to guarantee and ensure 'the correctness, reliability, or completeness of the information it publishes.
"ICNIRP e.V. undertakes all reasonable measures to ensure the reliability of information presented on the website, but does not guarantee the correctness, reliability, or completeness of the information and views published. The content of our website is provided to you for information only. We do not assume any responsibility for any damage, including direct or indirect loss suffered by users or third parties in connection with the use of our website and/or the information it contains, including for the use or the interpretation of any technical data, recommendations, or specifications available on our website."
"How ICNIRP, AGNIR, PHE [Public Health England rebranded in 2021 to UK Health Security Agency] and a 30 year old Political Decision Created and then Covered Up a Global Public Health Scandal" (2019)
As a long time subscriber to the UK Column, I am demanding a 'right to reply' to this article on 5G by Jobst Landgrebe.
As in my opinion the UK Column team have made a mass error is publishing this article by Jobst Landgrebe's on 5G. One thing I have always respected the UK Column team for is that they will make corrections when they make errors. Now, will the UK Column editorial team correct their error re this 5Garticle. We will see...
I will leave it there for the moment - much more evidence to share on this...this post is only the tip of a very big iceberg... @Ben Rubin @Dr Anne McCloskey
So why is @UK Column promoting this article ‘Is 5G dangerous?’ when the German author OMITS the material fact that from 2011 onwards the WHO's IARC classified a 'Group 2B carcinogen possibly carcinogenic to humans' for all wireless RF/EMF radiation exposure from any device or transmitting source - in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - which includes, but is not limited to, 5G, smart meters, 4G, blue-tooth, WiFi etc., OMITS any mention of cancer, infertility, etc. as a health effect from wireless RF/EMF radiation exposure in the entire article, etc & is, as Brian says, ‘in bed with’ Big Tech, Big Pharma, City of London, etc.?
UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY & DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE crown servants are Failing to Disclose Information that They Have a Legal Duty to Disclose:
From 2011 onwards, the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified all wireless RF/EMF radiation from any device or transmitting source - in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz which includes, but is not limited to, WiFi, 5G, etc. as a Group 2B carcinogen possibly carcinogenic to humans
The UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY & D.H.S.C. crown servants are failing to disclose and OMITTING the IARC Group 2B carcinogen classification for all wireless RF/EMF radiation on their websites & the GOV.UK website, and in all GOV.UK, UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY & PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND guidance including, but not limited to, Smart Meters, WiFi, 5G, etc.
Instead, the UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY, D.H.S.C. & the entire HM-GOVERNMENT “adopted” the fraudulent and absurd guidelines by the German based secret society - the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection ‘ICNIRP’ as official UK guidelines that intentionally OMIT the IARC Group 2B carcinogen classification for all wireless RF/EMF radiation & ignore and dismiss any long term (anything over 30 minutes) non-thermal harms such as cancer, infertility, etc.
So why is UK Column following & promoting this FRAUD in its article ‘Is 5G dangerous?’ whose German author OMITS the IARC Group 2B carcinogen classification, cancer, etc & is, as Brian says, ‘in bed with’ Big Tech, Big Pharma, City of London, etc.?
• The International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection ‘ICNIRP’ is a GERMAN based secret society that masquerades as a private organisation, an industry loyal Non Government Organisation (NGO).
• “ICNIRP selects its own members and its source of funding is not declared. New expert members of ICNIRP can only be elected by members of ICNIRP” [just saying that to me this seems very similar to how the freemasons select their members].
“Many of ICNIRP members have ties to the industry that is dependent on the ICNIRP guidelines. The [ICNIRP] guidelines are of huge economic and strategic importance to the military, telecoms/IT and power industry. Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines “do not cover cancer and other long-term or non-thermal health effects.”
“Thus, using the significantly higher [voluntary] guideline by ICNIRP gives a ‘green card’ to roll out the wireless digital technology thereby not considering non-thermal health effects from RF radiation. Numerous health hazards are disregarded such as cancer, effects on neurotransmitters and neuroprotection, blood-brain-barrier, cognition, psychological addiction, sleep, behavioural problems and sperm quality.”
@UK Column is the most powerful form of a lie an omission of material facts?
In this UK Column published article by Jobst Landgrebe, who through his company "Cognotekt" https://cognotekt.com/#ueber-cognotekt , has various deep conflicts of interest and completely OMITS any mention of the following:
• UN-INSURABLE is all wireless technology / devices / equipment that emits wireless RF/EMF radiation from the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue-tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, 5G, etc.
-there are currently NO insurers anywhere in the world who will cover wireless technology / devices / equipment that emits wireless RF/EMF radiation from the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes 5G frequencies, but also WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, etc.
• From at least 2014, if not before, LLOYDS OF LONDON has refused to insure against health effects from ALL wireless technology / devices / equipment that emit wireless RF/EMF radiation from any transmitting source in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue-tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, 5G, etc. using 'Exclusion 32'. This is still the case today.
- What is 'Exclusion 32'? “The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionising radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.” CFC UNDERWRITING LTD in London, the UK agent for LLOYDS OF LONDON https://zero5g.com/2019/electromagnetic-field-insurance-policy-exclusion-are-the-standard/
• In 2019, 5G is rated a high impact risk by SWISS RE GROUP one of the world's leading providers of reinsurance, insurance and other forms of insurance-based risk transfers in their SWISS RE SONAR 2019 New emerging risk insights (May 2019) report at page 29 “Off the leash – 5G mobile networks” states:
“5G – short for fifth generation – is the latest standard for cellular mobile
communications…To allow for a functional network coverage and increased capacity overall, more antennas will be needed, including acceptance of higher levels of electromagnetic radiation. In some jurisdictions, the rise of threshold values will require legal adaptation. Existing concerns regarding potential negative health effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) are only likely to increase. An uptick in liability claims could be a potential long-term consequence…Other concerns are focused on cyber exposures, which increase with the wider scope of 5G wireless attack surfaces. Traditionally IoT devices have poor security features. Moreover, hackers can also exploit 5G speed and volume, meaning that more data can be stolen much quicker.” [emphasis added]
• Fails to mention just like HM -GOVERNMENT CANCER, infertility, sperm damage, miscarriages (referenced within the scientific literature as spontaneous abortion) harms from wireless RF/EMF radiation exposure from any and all wireless technology / devices / equipment that emits wireless RF/EMF radiation.
-This is very telling and a tactic often used by the governments, military, industry, etc.
• Fails to mention the harms to children or the material fact that children absorb wireless (RF/EMF) radiation DEEPER into their bodies than adults.
• Fails to mention just like HM -GOVERNMENT that from 2011, the World Health Organisation’s ‘WHO’ International Agency for Research on Cancer 'IARC' classified wireless radiation (RF/EMF) a Group 2B carcinogen 'possibly carcinogenic to humans’ for all wireless RF/EMF radiation from any transmitting source - technology / device /equipment. -in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue-tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, 5G, etc.
• That the UK - HM-GOVERNMENT still rely on the deeply flawed and ridiculous INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONISING RADIATION PROTECTION 'ICNIRP' guidelines as the official UK guidelines even those these OMIT any non-thermal harms such as cancer, infertility, etc.
o “Thus, using the significantly higher [voluntary] guideline by ICNIRP gives a ‘green card’ to roll out the wireless digital technology thereby not considering non-thermal health effects from RF radiation. Numerous health hazards are disregarded such as cancer, effects on neurotransmitters and neuroprotection, blood-brain-barrier, cognition, psychological addiction, sleep, behavioural problems and sperm quality.” "World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)" (2017) by Lennart Hardell in International Journal of Oncology https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504984/pdf/ijo-51-02-0405.pdf
Why did UK Column publish this article by Jobst Landgrebe? It is, in my informed opinion, extremely biased, suffers from obvious conflicts of interest, blatantly "cherry picks" and omits the scientific studies that show harm - such as CANCER and infertility.
Jobst Landgrebe's complete and total omission from this UK Column article of ANY mention of CANCER is very telling.
For those of us independent researchers in field, this is an instant red flag and we have seen this technique of omitting any research on CANCER or mention of CANCER being used time and time again usually by those who are in some way connected or dependent on the wireless industry, the INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONIZING-RADIATION PROTECTION 'ICNIRP', government, military, etc. See below.
The UK's Dr Sarah J. Starkey masterfully deconstructs these "cherry picking" techniques in ‘Inaccurate official assessment of radiofrequency safety by the Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation’ (2016) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27902455/ .
Please note that about thee (3) months after Dr Starkey's peer reviewed paper was published the UK Government shut down AGNIR. Why?
So who is Jobst Landgrebe? Jobst Landgrebe https://wikitia.com/wiki/Jobst_Landgrebe is the German Founder, partner and managing director for the German based company "Cognotekt" https://cognotekt.com/elementor-landingpage-1522
Cognotekt is directly linked according to its website to Biotech & Big Pharma companies - inc. BAYER that bought MONSANTO and now has Billions in liability re US court cases for Roundup/Glyphosate causing CANCER- amongst others, AI & IT = Big Tech companies such as MedGate https://medgate.de/ which use and are dependent on the wireless industry, medical technology, patient care that looks to automate, bring in AI and digitise patient care.
Why is Germany important?
In this UK Column article by Jobst Landgrebe he cites the INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONIZING-RADIATION PROTECTION 'ICNIRP' (5) times and only on the fifth (5th) time in the conclusion mentions that ICNIRP is "interest-driven" and "an association of telecommunications equipment manufacturers whose thresholds cannot be considered neutral" but once again Jobst Landgrebe is "cherry picking" and has left out some material facts why?
ICNIRPS links to the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMLPEX:
ICNIRP is a GERMAN based private organisation, an industry loyal Non Government Organisation (NGO). “ICNIRP selects its own members and its source of funding is not declared. New expert members of ICNIRP can only be elected by members of ICNIRP…
“Many of ICNIRP members have ties to the industry that is dependent on the ICNIRP guidelines. The [ICNIRP] guidelines are of huge economic and strategic importance to the military, telecoms/IT and power industry. Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines “do not cover cancer and other long-term or non-thermal health effects.”
“Thus, using the significantly higher [voluntary] guideline by ICNIRP gives a ‘green card’ to roll out the wireless digital technology thereby not considering non-thermal health effects from RF radiation. Numerous health hazards are disregarded such as CANCER, effects on neurotransmitters and neuroprotection, blood-brain-barrier, cognition, psychological addiction, sleep, behavioural problems and sperm quality.”
From "World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)" (2017) by Lennart Hardell in International Journal of Oncology https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504984/pdf/ijo-51-02-0405.pdf
**Note the Journal of Oncology.
ICNIRP from the horse's mouth:
Below is taken from ICNIRP's website - I'll let you the reader decide if this is an organisation going to guarantee and ensure 'the correctness, reliability, or completeness of the information it publishes.
"ICNIRP e.V. undertakes all reasonable measures to ensure the reliability of information presented on the website, but does not guarantee the correctness, reliability, or completeness of the information and views published. The content of our website is provided to you for information only. We do not assume any responsibility for any damage, including direct or indirect loss suffered by users or third parties in connection with the use of our website and/or the information it contains, including for the use or the interpretation of any technical data, recommendations, or specifications available on our website."
https://www.icnirp.org/en/legal-notice.html
To see just how far this debacle goes - see
"How ICNIRP, AGNIR, PHE [Public Health England rebranded in 2021 to UK Health Security Agency] and a 30 year old Political Decision Created and then Covered Up a Global Public Health Scandal" (2019)
https://communityoperatingsystem.wordpress.com/2019/09/12/how-icnirp-agnir-phe-and-a-30-year-old-political-decision-created-and-then-covered-up-a-global-public-health-scandal/
Right to Reply
As a long time subscriber to the UK Column, I am demanding a 'right to reply' to this article on 5G by Jobst Landgrebe.
As in my opinion the UK Column team have made a mass error is publishing this article by Jobst Landgrebe's on 5G. One thing I have always respected the UK Column team for is that they will make corrections when they make errors. Now, will the UK Column editorial team correct their error re this 5Garticle. We will see...
I will leave it there for the moment - much more evidence to share on this...this post is only the tip of a very big iceberg... @Ben Rubin @Dr Anne McCloskey
So why is @UK Column promoting this article ‘Is 5G dangerous?’ when the German author OMITS the material fact that from 2011 onwards the WHO's IARC classified a 'Group 2B carcinogen possibly carcinogenic to humans' for all wireless RF/EMF radiation exposure from any device or transmitting source - in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - which includes, but is not limited to, 5G, smart meters, 4G, blue-tooth, WiFi etc., OMITS any mention of cancer, infertility, etc. as a health effect from wireless RF/EMF radiation exposure in the entire article, etc & is, as Brian says, ‘in bed with’ Big Tech, Big Pharma, City of London, etc.?
UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY & DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE crown servants are Failing to Disclose Information that They Have a Legal Duty to Disclose:
From 2011 onwards, the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified all wireless RF/EMF radiation from any device or transmitting source - in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz which includes, but is not limited to, WiFi, 5G, etc. as a Group 2B carcinogen possibly carcinogenic to humans
https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf
The UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY & D.H.S.C. crown servants are failing to disclose and OMITTING the IARC Group 2B carcinogen classification for all wireless RF/EMF radiation on their websites & the GOV.UK website, and in all GOV.UK, UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY & PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND guidance including, but not limited to, Smart Meters, WiFi, 5G, etc.
Instead, the UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY, D.H.S.C. & the entire HM-GOVERNMENT “adopted” the fraudulent and absurd guidelines by the German based secret society - the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection ‘ICNIRP’ as official UK guidelines that intentionally OMIT the IARC Group 2B carcinogen classification for all wireless RF/EMF radiation & ignore and dismiss any long term (anything over 30 minutes) non-thermal harms such as cancer, infertility, etc.
So why is UK Column following & promoting this FRAUD in its article ‘Is 5G dangerous?’ whose German author OMITS the IARC Group 2B carcinogen classification, cancer, etc & is, as Brian says, ‘in bed with’ Big Tech, Big Pharma, City of London, etc.?
• The International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection ‘ICNIRP’ is a GERMAN based secret society that masquerades as a private organisation, an industry loyal Non Government Organisation (NGO).
• “ICNIRP selects its own members and its source of funding is not declared. New expert members of ICNIRP can only be elected by members of ICNIRP” [just saying that to me this seems very similar to how the freemasons select their members].
“Many of ICNIRP members have ties to the industry that is dependent on the ICNIRP guidelines. The [ICNIRP] guidelines are of huge economic and strategic importance to the military, telecoms/IT and power industry. Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines “do not cover cancer and other long-term or non-thermal health effects.”
“Thus, using the significantly higher [voluntary] guideline by ICNIRP gives a ‘green card’ to roll out the wireless digital technology thereby not considering non-thermal health effects from RF radiation. Numerous health hazards are disregarded such as cancer, effects on neurotransmitters and neuroprotection, blood-brain-barrier, cognition, psychological addiction, sleep, behavioural problems and sperm quality.”
From "World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)" (2017) by Lennart Hardell in International Journal of Oncology https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504984/pdf/ijo-51-02-0405.pdf
@UK Column is the most powerful form of a lie an omission of material facts?
In this UK Column published article by Jobst Landgrebe, who through his company "Cognotekt" https://cognotekt.com/#ueber-cognotekt , has various deep conflicts of interest and completely OMITS any mention of the following:
• UN-INSURABLE is all wireless technology / devices / equipment that emits wireless RF/EMF radiation from the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue-tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, 5G, etc.
-there are currently NO insurers anywhere in the world who will cover wireless technology / devices / equipment that emits wireless RF/EMF radiation from the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes 5G frequencies, but also WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, etc.
• From at least 2014, if not before, LLOYDS OF LONDON has refused to insure against health effects from ALL wireless technology / devices / equipment that emit wireless RF/EMF radiation from any transmitting source in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue-tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, 5G, etc. using 'Exclusion 32'. This is still the case today.
- What is 'Exclusion 32'? “The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionising radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.” CFC UNDERWRITING LTD in London, the UK agent for LLOYDS OF LONDON https://zero5g.com/2019/electromagnetic-field-insurance-policy-exclusion-are-the-standard/
• In 2019, 5G is rated a high impact risk by SWISS RE GROUP one of the world's leading providers of reinsurance, insurance and other forms of insurance-based risk transfers in their SWISS RE SONAR 2019 New emerging risk insights (May 2019) report at page 29 “Off the leash – 5G mobile networks” states:
“5G – short for fifth generation – is the latest standard for cellular mobile
communications…To allow for a functional network coverage and increased capacity overall, more antennas will be needed, including acceptance of higher levels of electromagnetic radiation. In some jurisdictions, the rise of threshold values will require legal adaptation. Existing concerns regarding potential negative health effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) are only likely to increase. An uptick in liability claims could be a potential long-term consequence…Other concerns are focused on cyber exposures, which increase with the wider scope of 5G wireless attack surfaces. Traditionally IoT devices have poor security features. Moreover, hackers can also exploit 5G speed and volume, meaning that more data can be stolen much quicker.” [emphasis added]
https://expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Swiss-Re-SONAR-2019-report.pdf and https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sonar/sonar2019.html
• Fails to mention just like HM -GOVERNMENT CANCER, infertility, sperm damage, miscarriages (referenced within the scientific literature as spontaneous abortion) harms from wireless RF/EMF radiation exposure from any and all wireless technology / devices / equipment that emits wireless RF/EMF radiation.
-This is very telling and a tactic often used by the governments, military, industry, etc.
o see "World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)" (2017) by Lennart Hardell in the International Journal of Oncology. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504984/pdf/ijo-51-02-0405.pdf
• Fails to mention the harms to children or the material fact that children absorb wireless (RF/EMF) radiation DEEPER into their bodies than adults.
• Fails to mention just like HM -GOVERNMENT that from 2011, the World Health Organisation’s ‘WHO’ International Agency for Research on Cancer 'IARC' classified wireless radiation (RF/EMF) a Group 2B carcinogen 'possibly carcinogenic to humans’ for all wireless RF/EMF radiation from any transmitting source - technology / device /equipment. -in the range of 30 KHz to 300 GHz - this includes WiFi, smart meters, 2G, 3G, 4G, Blue-tooth, Internet-of-Things ‘IoT’, 5G, etc.
https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf
• That the UK - HM-GOVERNMENT still rely on the deeply flawed and ridiculous INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONISING RADIATION PROTECTION 'ICNIRP' guidelines as the official UK guidelines even those these OMIT any non-thermal harms such as cancer, infertility, etc.
o See "The WHO finds mobile phone and wireless radiation cause cancer: As published in the Daily Sceptic, 5th May 2025" by Gillian Jamieson https://gillianjamieson.substack.com/p/the-who-finds-mobile-phone-and-wireless
o “Thus, using the significantly higher [voluntary] guideline by ICNIRP gives a ‘green card’ to roll out the wireless digital technology thereby not considering non-thermal health effects from RF radiation. Numerous health hazards are disregarded such as cancer, effects on neurotransmitters and neuroprotection, blood-brain-barrier, cognition, psychological addiction, sleep, behavioural problems and sperm quality.” "World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)" (2017) by Lennart Hardell in International Journal of Oncology https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504984/pdf/ijo-51-02-0405.pdf
Excellent article